Massage, Reflexology, Reiki & Floating @ Healing Arts Center LLC
Treating Specific Conditions -- Alternative methods that have worked for some
SKUNK TREATMENT FOR CURIOUS DOGS
Mix 1 quart Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) + 1/4 cup baking soda + 1 tsp. liquid soap like Dawn dishwashing detergent (looking for grease effectiveness)
Wipe off affected area with paper towels. You may want rubber or garden gloves on first. Skunk spray is an oil. Remove as much as possible this way. You'll never want to use the towel or gloves used for this again!
Sponge in the above mixture, being sure to keep away from the dogs' eyes. Rinse thoroughly with warm water.
This is not my concoction, but I have tried it on my own curious dog who doesn't allow critters to cross his yard. I think this one got away though! It is extremely effective and works the first time.
The Potential Toxic Concerns Regarding Typical Laundry Detergent Ingredients
We all make a significant effort to ensure our clothes are clean and fresh, but ironically the very detergents that we normally use to get our clothes "clean" may actually be leaving them worse off than they were before we ran the wash.
That is because most consumer laundry detergents, the normal brands found at supermarkets, etc., may be loaded with potentially toxic chemicals that could harm you, your family and the environment. Residues of these chemicals remain on your clothing, even after washing and drying the clothes, and are possibly absorbed into your body through your skin and even evaporated into the air where they may be breathed in.
A Typical Laundry Detergent
If you take a look at the label of a typical bottle of laundry detergent, you'll find that the ingredients are rather vague. It may also use a qualifying statement like "ingredients include", which deceives the customer into thinking all ingredients are listed, when in fact they are not. The few ingredients that are mentioned are vague and non-specific. One popular brand listed, for instance:
Cleaning agents (anionic and nonionic surfactants), buffering agent, stabilizer, brightening agent, fragrance
From this list, it is extremely difficult to determine what exactly is even in the detergent, or what these ingredients do. The detergent companies are not required by law to list their actual specific ingredients, and we have found no major national brand that is willing to give full disclosure to their customers on their packaging.
So after doing some research of ingredients typically found in laundry detergent, we decided to do it for them and broke down some of the more common laundry ingredients out there that have been reported by various sources, so you can at least have an idea of what you are washing your family's clothes with. After reading the list, I am sure you can understand the reticence of detergent companies to fully disclose specific detergent ingredients to their customers on their packaging. They would probably prefer that you go on believing that you're simply using "soap". Although there is no way to definitively determine the actual specific ingredients in each laundry detergent brand, here's the list as far as we have been able to ascertain from our research:
Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulfonates (LAS): These synthetic petrochemicals are normally listed as 'anionic surfactants' on labels, and are one of the most common surfactants in use. During their production process, carcinogenic and reproductive toxins such as benzene are released into the environment. They also biodegrade slowly, making them a hazard in the environment. The amount of LAS used in detergents may vary to as high as 30% of the weight of the total product.
Benzene is a natural constituent of crude oil, but it is usually synthesized from other compounds present in petroleum. The US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) classifies benzene as a known human carcinogen. The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has set a permissible exposure limit of 0.5 part of benzene per million parts of air (.5 ppm) in the workplace during an 8-hour workday, 40-hour workweek. The short term exposure limit for airborne benzene is 5 ppm for 15 minutes.
Benzene exposure has serious health effects. The short term breathing of high levels of benzene can result in death, while low levels can cause drowsiness, dizziness, rapid heart rate, headaches, tremors, confusion, and unconsciousness. Eating or drinking foods containing high levels of benzene can cause vomiting, irritation of the stomach, dizziness, sleepiness, convulsions, and death.
Human exposure to benzene is a global health problem. Benzene targets liver, kidney, lung, heart and the brain and can cause DNA strand breaks, chromosomal damage etc. Benzene causes cancer in both animals and humans. Benzene was first reported to induce cancer in humans in the 1920s. The chemical industry claims it wasn't until 1979 that the cancer inducing properties were determined "conclusively" in humans, despite many references to this fact in the medical literature. Industry exploited this "discrepancy" and tried to discredit animal studies which showed benzene caused cancer saying that they weren't relevant to humans. Benzene may or may not be in the actual detergent bottle (we cannot confirm this either way based on our research), but certainly benzene being released into the environment during the production of these surfactants is cause for serious concern.
Nonylphenol Ethoxylate (NPE): A common petrochemical surfactant in U.S. laundry detergents. This chemical has been banned in the European Union and Canada in detergents. Is it biodegradable? Yes. But it was found to slowly biodegrade into even more toxic compounds.
Extensive research indicates that NPE metabolites interfere with the hormones of fish and shellfish, thus affecting nearly every cell and organ in the body. Exposure to NPE metabolites causes organisms to develop both male and female sex organs; increases mortality and damage to the liver and kidney; decreases testicular growth and sperm counts in male fish; and disrupts normal male to female sex-ratios, metabolism, development, growth, and reproduction.
Canada and the European Union have banned the use of NPEs in detergents, as NPE metabolites are toxic and their use ?may have an immediate or long-term harmful effect on the environment or its biological diversity.? In 2004 alone, more than 260 million pounds of NPE was used in the U.S.
The Sierra Club has developed an extensive report exposing the risks of NPEs and their usage in laundry detergent.
Petroleum distillates (aka napthas): These petrochemicals have been linked to cancer, lung damage, lung inflammation and damage to mucous membranes. Derived from synthetic crude oil.
Phenols: According to the United States National Institutes of Health, phenol is toxic and people who are hypersensitive to it could experience death or serious side effects at very low exposures. Plus, it is rapidly absorbed and can cause toxicity throughout the entire body. Typically, death and severe toxicity result from phenol's effects on the central nervous system, heart, blood vessels, lungs and kidneys.
Optical Brighteners: These synthetic chemicals convert UV light wavelengths into visible light, which makes clothing laundered with them to "trick" the eye into seeing a brighter shade and reflect more light. (although does not actually affect the cleanliness of the clothing). They've been found to be toxic to fish and to cause bacterial mutations. Furthermore, they can even cause allergic reactions in humans when exposed to skin that is later exposed to sunlight.
How do optical brighteners work?
You may remember your mother or grandmother using a product called "bluing" in the laundry to make whites appear brighter. Bluing agents remove yellow light to lessen the yellow tinge, but optical brighteners act differently. These agents "absorb ultraviolet light and emit it back as visible blue light. This blue light masks any yellowing that may be present in the treated material and makes it seem brighter and whiter than it would otherwise naturally appear to the eye" (seventhgeneration.com). Your clothes are no cleaner than they would be without brightening agents, but they appear to be.
Optical brighteners are not effective unless they remain on the fabric after washing, whereby they are constantly being breathed in and touching and absorbing into your skin. Clothes washed in detergents containing these agents will have a potentially health threatening chemical residue left behind on the fabric. This is why line dried clothing often feels stiff unless fluffed in the dryer. Clothing laundered without optical whiteners will feel soft right off the line.
What are the human health and environmental concerns of using optical brighteners?
Frequently, skin rashes commonly blamed on fragrance and dyes are actually caused by optical brighteners, so optical brighteners (found in most detergents) should not be used by individuals with sensitive skin. Eye irritation can also occur. Optical whiteners contain chemicals that can be toxic to fish and other animal and plant life. Many have also been shown to cause mutations in bacteria (seventhgeneration.com). In addition, these chemicals are not readily biodegradable, so pollution remains in waste water for long periods of time, negatively affecting water quality and animal and plant life. U.S. military cannot use optical brighteners, because they may put their lives at further risk in the field.
Artificial Fragrances: Many of these can be made from petroleum (see petroleum distillates above), and do not degrade in the environment. They've been linked to various toxic effects on fish and mammals, and often cause allergies and skin and eye irritation.
Phosphates: These chemicals are used to remove hard-water minerals to make detergents more effective, and to prevent dirt from settling back onto clothes during a wash. A major problem with them is that, when released into the environment, they stimulate the growth of certain marine plants, which contributes to unbalanced ecosystems. In the 1970s, the U.S. government recognized the problem of phosphorus pollution -- it can cause massive algal blooms in waterways that damage ecosystems by robbing the water and aquatic life of all-important oxygen. Many states have banned or restricted the use of phosphates for this reason, and you may see laundry detergents advertised as "low-phosphate" or "phosphate-free." Many brands have thankfully eliminated phosphates from their formulations.
EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid ): EDTA is a grouping of compounds used as an alternative to phosphates to reduce mineral hardness in water, prevent bleaching agents from becoming active before they are put in water and also as a foaming stabilizer. EDTA has been found to be both cytotoxic and weakly genotoxic in laboratory animals. Oral exposures have been noted to cause reproductive and developmental effects. EDTA is not degraded or removed during conventional wastewater treatment. EDTA does not readily biodegrade and can redissolve toxic heavy metals in the environment, allowing them to reintroduce into the food chain.
Sodium Hypochlorite (Household Bleach): This is a chemical precursor to chlorine, which is extremely toxic and involved in more household poisonings than any other chemical. When it reacts with organic materials in the environment, carcinogenic and toxic compounds are created than can cause reproductive, endocrine and immune system disorders. Skin contact will produce caustic irritation or burns due to defatting and saponification of skin oils and destruction of tissue. Mixing bleach with other cleaning products can generate hazardous fumes that are carcinogenic, and can even cause death.
A recent study indicated for the first time that sodium hypochlorite and organic chemicals (e.g., surfactants, fragrances) contained in several household cleaning products react to generate chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These chlorinated compounds are emitted during cleaning applications and most of them are toxic and probable human carcinogens.The study showed that indoor air concentrations significantly increase (8-52 times for chloroform and 1-1170 times for carbon tetrachloride) during the use of bleach containing products. The significant increases observed in indoor air concentrations of several chlorinated VOCs (especially carbon tetrachloride and chloroform) indicate that the household bleach use is a newly identified source that could be important in terms of inhalation exposure to these compounds.
Preliminary risk assessment suggested that using these cleaning products may significantly increase cancer risk. In addition to its direct toxic effects on living organisms, chlorine also reacts with organic materials in the environment to create other hazardous and carcinogenic toxins, including trihalomethanes and chloroform (THMs), and organochlorines, an extremely dangerous class of compounds that cause reproductive, endocrine and immune system disorders. The most well known organochlorine is dioxin. Products containing chlorine (or any of its derivatives or precursors, including sodium hypochlorite) should be considered highly unacceptable. Similarly, any chemical with "chlor" as part of its description, or any ingredient listed as "bleach," should be considered unacceptable as this nomenclature indicates the presence of a highly toxic and environmentally damaging chlorinated compound. Chlorine and chlorinated compounds are also a leading cause of atmospheric ozone loss. Chlorine use in the laundry also degrades both natural and synthetic fibers.
Chlorine is listed in the 1990 Clean Air Act as a hazardous air pollutant and is on the EPA?s Community Right To Know list. In 1993, the American Public Health Association issued a resolution calling for the gradual phase-out of most organochlorine compounds.
Sources: United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), United States National Institutes Of Health (NIH), United States Department Of Health and Human Services (HHS), United States Air Force, Wikipedia, the Sierra Club, Sixwise.com, Associatedcontent.com, healthychild.org, seventhgeneration.com
The U.S. EPA has prepared a list of laundry detergent ingredients that they have concern about.
I have been asked by several people just what I did to obtain the tremendous results I have had with my fight against terminal cancer. I am emailing this 2-page summary to everyone because I want you all to know there are alternatives out there that really work. If you know anyone who needs this information please feel free to share it with them. I do not profit in any way by this information exchange; I would just like to return the blessing you all have been to me.
My Healing Journey: A Path Directed By God
In January of 2007 I was diagnosed with terminal mesothelioma, a particularly nasty type of cancer that attacks the lining of organs in the body. There are two types of mesothelioma, one attacks only the lining of the lungs and one attacks only the lining of the abdominal organs. After my first appointment with Dr. Lenzi at M D Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, I was found to have BOTH TYPES. This was confirmed by biopsies at Baptist Hospital in Beaumont, St. Elizabeth Hospital in Beaumont, and at M D Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
My prognosis was a maximum life span of 6 months from diagnosis if I had only the lung type and perhaps 9 months if I had only the abdominal type. But since it was so rare to have BOTH types, the doctor could only guess that I would live less than 6 months.
The doctor explained that there was no reason to do surgery for this type of cancer because the tumors multiplied at a faster rate than surgery could remove them. He offered to set me up with very strong chemotherapy on the chance that it might be able to slow the growth of the cancer a little, but he also told me that historically the chemo treatments did nothing to prolong the life of a mesothelioma patient.
I chose not to have any treatment at all, and Dr. Lenzi supported that decicion, recommending that I have regular CT scans to determine the growth speed of the cancer. I had decided that I was not willing to spend the last few months of my life so ill from treatments that I could not enjoy my time with family and friends.
I have a very strong faith (I am Pentecostal) and believe that God has the power to heal and still heals today. I began earnestly praying for a miracle. I was blessed to have a very strong network of friends and family who joined me in prayer; many of them felt strongly that I would be healed by God.
I expected that God would one day just zap me and it would be done! However, God had a very different path for me, and its this path I would like to share with you.
After researching many alternative forms of healing and many clinics, products and doctors, and praying about each one that crossed my path, I received a call from Kathy Barner, our upline sales leader in Shaklee Products. (We have been involved in Shaklee since my husband, Marvin, was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis in 1977.)
Kathy told me about a doctor in her group, Dr. Elena Morreale, from Tampa, FL that had been having great success with natural cancer treatment.
While I was still talking to Kathy I started to feel very strongly that this was the path I was to take. I made an appointment with Dr. Morreale two weeks from that day.
During my wait to see Dr. Morreale, I had very strong misgivings about the protocol she recommends (Kathy had told me some of it). Since it involved a strict diet with NO SUGAR, I was uncertain if I could follow it. I really didn?t think I could live without eating some form of sugar! After much prayer and soul-searching, I decided that if this was the path God chose for my healing I would do it, no matter how much I had to change my life. I had to decide at that moment that I REALLY wanted to live.
When I first went to Dr. Morreale I noticed a sign in her office that said, "The Power that made the body, heals the body. It happens no other way." I was very impressed with this philosophy (fact, actually) because I do believe that God has already given us everything we need to be well. We just have to have enough self-control to follow His plan. And that is where I had failed, and what I had to do.
Dr. Morreale evaluated my health, rated my tumor markers at 10 and 10 (the highest they could be rated, indicating active, growing cancer), and started me on a strict protocol that included an all-organic diet with very little meat (only organic chicken or turkey occasionally), NO sugar of any kind (including honey, cane, molasses, etc.), NO artificial sweeteners with the exception of Stevia (a leaf extract), soy and whey protein supplements, many vitamins, minerals and anti-oxidants, and homeopathic drops. I also purchased a far-infrared sauna which I used daily (Dr. Morreale did not require this, but said it would be helpful). I used a small rebounder-type trampoline daily and had lymphatic massage three times a week when possible.
When I went to Dr. Morreale I was an insulin-dependent diabetic; I took two shots and four pills daily for diabetes. I also had mild hypertension.
In only a few weeks on this protocol I began to show signs of the cancer retreating! My tumor markers went to 7 and 8, then 4 and 5. My death date, June 2007 passed and instead of being dead I was feeling better all the time!
I continued to have follow-up CT scans at M. D. Anderson, and they asked me to fill out an extensive survey during this time on how I felt about having a very short time to live, and how they could help. Since I was only supposed to live a few months, the survey was stopped after June 2007. The scans were continually showing no growth in any tumors, and no new tumors were developing!
Then in September 2007 Dr. Morreale detected a slow-down in my healing. She adjusted the supplements and drops, etc., to allow faster progress. In the same month, the CT scan at M. D. Anderson showed what they thought might be slight growth in two of the tumors in the abdomen, but no change in the others.
By March 2008 Dr. Morreale found that my tumor markers were both at ZERO, which indicated there was NO LIVE CANCER left in my body. The CT scans at M. D. Anderson in March 2008 indicated no growth in any tumor, and the tumor near my liver that had been growing in the last CT scan was GONE! In addition, the doctor there said there was no reason for me to return for further scans unless I wanted them!
In addition to stopping the cancer, this health protocol has healed my body in other ways; Instead of 2 shots & 4 pills a day for diabetes, I take 1/2 of 1 pill! Also my blood pressure medicine has been cut in half.
Marvin has supported me in this 100% and has also benefitted from the protocol. He was taking 10 prescriptions when he started this (for hypertension, high cholesterol, high triglycerides, etc.) and now he is down to 3 a day! That's WONDERFUL! And we both feel so much better than we did just a year ago!
I have no idea what the future holds, but I know Who holds the future, and I plan to continue this protocol until I have permanently defeated the cancer, diabetes and whatever other ailments this old body has to fight.
I do not presume to believe this is everyone's answer; however, I know it worked for me and I wanted others to know there is an alternative to giving up. With faith, prayer and works I believe the battle against cancer can be won.
I would be glad to share information with anyone who needs this. Please feel free to call me anytime.
God bless you all!
Ann Copeland --- (409) 769-4314 [email protected]
GLUTEN INTOLERANCE/CELIAC DISEASE
By Rebecca Arrick--My daughter and I are gluten intolerant. I used to weigh 180+ (now steady at 135). I had developed a serious case of gastrointestinal flu one fall and shortly after that it seemed I was running to the bathroom shortly after every meal, sometimes before I was done eating. I had constant diarrhea. Immodium A-D didn't help. I started to drop weight dramatically and I wasn't trying. I had always had trouble dropping weight before. Within a year I had dropped to 120. My doctor (at the time) said I probably had irritable bowel and should watch what I ate and try to "enhance my calm" basically. I had mood swings that were off the charts and fought daily with depression. I didn't know what foods to avoid or that the mood problems were related to my diet.
Some people are the other way, they gain weight and are constipated
Finally, a lady who sat behind me at my previous dead-end job said I should try this elimination diet -- it eliminated all common food allergens. http://www.cfids.org/about-cfids/elimination-diet.asp I lost the original list, but this link is comparable and a good resource. It says,
"On the initial elimination diet, avoid:
any fruit you eat more than once a week
food colors and dyes
From: "Detecting Food Allergies" by the International Health Foundation, Box 3494, Jackson TN 38303.
Signs and Symptoms of Food Sensitivity
dark circles under the eyes
skin rash or bumps on the arms
I had all of the above symptoms in the extreme. So, basically, for several days, I only ate salads with olive oil and salt and pepper for dressing and Fritos (just corn, oil and salt). I had suspected a wheat intolerance, so I went with the corn. Voila! My symptoms disappeared almost instantly. Then, I really started reading labels when trying to add in new foods.
If you are gluten intolerant, MODIFIED FOOD STARCH is a big thing to avoid. I have found recently a product that contained modified food starch but was labeled gluten free. It did not bother me.
Also watch out for high-fructose corn syrup. I read in the magazine Bicycling that it is another form of gluten. I had tried KickStart for a morning pick-me-up and it was as if I had ingested gluten.
Watch for what you crave--it may lead you right to your food allergy. I loved bread, the more whole-grain the better. I loved McDonalds. Guess what?! Even their french-fries contain gluten or are cross-contaminated with things fried in the same oil. Some manufacturers' beans contain modified food starch. You should become the best label-reader ever!
FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS/MENU ITEMS
Wendy's is my friend. Their chili is gluten free.Their french fries, especially their new ones are fabulous and they have a dedicated fryer.Their burgers are just meat, no fillers - and they are happy to supply them without a bun.
Culver's now offers a gluten-free bun, but watch out for the fries. They do not have a dedicated fryer.
Most Mexican restaurants are okay if you stay away from the flour tortillas. I have no problem with tamales (corn meal) and enchiladas (corn tortilla). However, they probably do not have a dedicated fryer. If you are extremely intolerant, this might be a problem.
Many restaurants have become enlightened to the gluten-free diet and are willing to accomodate your needs and make substitutions and recommendations. Red Lobster was especially helpful when I told them of my condition. Uno's in Greenwood has a gluten free menu and goes out of their way to keep items pure. They won't even serve gluten-and non-gluten foods at the same time!
The Barefoot Burger in Crawfordsville is enlightened as to gluten sensitivities. They have a wonderful gluten-free bun and can help you with the menu choices. And Jim Petroski makes the BEST margaritas! Although El Charro's are really exceptional as well.
You don't have to never have pizza or homemade noodles or pancakes again. You don't have to eat from the expensive mixes. Try substituting Bob's Red Mill Gluten Free All-Purpose Flour and a little Xanthan Gum in your favorite recipes for regular flour and they usually turn out pretty good. Xanthan gum helps GF flour act more like "normal" flour.
Good Cook Books that also have information on GF diets: (in order of my preference)
Breaking the Vicious Cycle: Intestinal Health Through Diet, Elaine Gottschall, B.A., MSc. 0969276818 This should be your first read! Tells you all about the disorder.
The Gluten-Free Gourmet Bakes Bread, Bette Hagman. 0805060782 Other titles include The Gluten-Free Gourmet (1990), More from the Gluten-free Gourmet (1993), The Gluten-free Gourmet Cooks Fast and Healthy (1996)
Gluten-Free Quick & Easy, Carol Fenster, Ph.D., 1583332788 Also author of Wheat-Free Recipes and Menus
The No-Gluten Cookbook, Kimberly A. Tessmer, R.D., L.D., 1598690892